So sánh chip e5700 và e8400

{

CPU Cores CPU Threads Clock Speed Turbo Frequency System Bus Max TDP Lithography Bit Width Max Temperature Virtualization Technology

2	2
-	2
3 GHz	3 GHz
-	-
-	1333 MHz
65 W	65 W
45 nm	45 nm
-	64 Bit
-	72°C
no	no

L1 Cache Size L2 Cache Size L3 Cache Size Memory Types Memory Channels ECC Memory Support

128 KB	128 KB
2048 KB	6144 KB
-	-
-	2
no	no

Integrated Graphics Base GPU Frequency Max GPU Frequency DirectX Displays Supported

no		no
-		-
-		-
-		-
-		-

Mini Review

The Pentium Dual-Core brand was used for mainstream x86-architecture microprocessors from Intel from 2006 to 2009 when it was renamed to Pentium. The processors are based on either the 32-bit Yonah or (with quite different microarchitectures) 64-bit Merom-2M, Allendale, and Wolfdale-3M core, targeted at mobile or desktop computers.In terms of features, price and performance at a given clock frequency, Pentium Dual-Core processors were positioned above Celeron but below Core and Core 2 microprocessors in Intel's product range. The Pentium Dual-Core was also a very popular choice for overclocking, as it can deliver optimal performance (when overclocked) at a low price.

Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz is a middle-class Processor based on the 45nm Core micro-architecture. It offers 2 Physical Cores (2 Logical), clocked at 3.0GHz and 6MB of L2 Cache. Among its many features, Virtualization is activated. The processor DOES NOT integrated any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 65W. It offers average performance. It will therefore become a bottleneck in today's demanding games.

Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz - 491
Intel Celeron D 420 @ 1.7 GHz - 585
AMD Athlon LE-1640 - 659
AMD Sempron 140 - 847
Intel Pentium Dual E2140 @ 1.6 GHz - 906
Intel Pentium Dual E2160 @ 1.8 GHz - 1030
Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.8 GHz - 1057
Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz - 1080
Intel Pentium Dual E2180 @ 2.0 GHz - 1125

Intel Pentium Dual E2200 @ 2.2 GHz - 1248
Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.2 GHz - 1271
AMD Sempron X2 180 1279
Intel Pentium Dual E2220 @ 2.4 GHz - 1384
Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.3 GHz - 1441
Intel Celeron E3200 @ 2.4 GHz - 1553
Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.4 GHz - 1570
AMD Athlon II X2 215 - 1583
AMD Athlon II X2 240 - 1593
Pentium Dual-Core E6300 @ 2.8 GHz - 1631
AMD Athlon II X2 245 - 1648
Intel Celeron E3300 @ 2.5 GHz - 1649
Pentium Dual-Core E5200 @ 2.5 GHz - 1663
Intel Celeron E3400 @ 2.6 GHz - 1674
Pentium Dual-Core E5300 @ 2.6 GHz - 1735
Pentium Dual-Core E6500 @ 2.93GHz 1744

Pentium Dual-Core E5400 @ 2.7 GHz - 1798
Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz - 1830
Pentium Dual-Core E5500 @ 2.8 GHz - 1842
AMD A4-3300 APU 1942
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz - 1985
AMD A4-5300 APU 2002
Pentium Dual-Core E5700 @ 3.0 GHz - 2007
AMD A4-3400 APU 2013
Pentium Dual-Core E6600 @ 3.06GHz - 2067
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.0 GHz - 2193
Intel Pentium G620 @ 2.6 GHz 2255
Intel Celeron G530 @ 2.4 GHz 2270

Intel Celeron G550 @ 2.60GHz 2353
Intel Pentium G630 @ 2.7 GHz 2418
AMD Athlon II X3 440 2564
Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz 2577
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz > G640 > G550 2632
Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz 2657
Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz > G850 > G640 2727
AMD Athlon II X3 450 2800
Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz 2857
Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz > G860 > G2010 2884
AMD A6-3500 APU 2966
AMD Phenom II X4 830 3490
AMD Phenom II X4 945 3630
AMD Athlon II X4 645 3672
AMD Phenom II X4 940 3681
Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.1GHz 3865
Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.4 GHz 4000
Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.40GHz 4002
Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz 4276
AMD Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core 4463
AMD A6-3650 APU 4881
Intel Core i7 920 @ 2.67GHz 5520
Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.0 GHz 6032
Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.3 GHz 6602
Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.1 GHz 7179 anh em forum xem có đúng ko ạ

• Thích
• Yêu
• Haha
• Wow
• Khóc
• Giận

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Pentium E5700 on one side and the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Processor		Intel Pentium E5700				Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Penryn				Penryn
Core name		Wolfdale-3M				Wolfdale
Family		Pentium 5000				Core 2 Duo 8000
Part number(s), S-Spec		BX80571E5700, BXC80571E5700, AT80571PG0802ML, SLGTH				BX80570E8400, BXC80570E8400, BX80570E8400A, AT80570PJ0806M, EU80570PJ0806M, SLB9J
Release date		Q3 2010				Q1 2008
Lithography		45 nm				45 nm
Transistors		228,000,000				410,000,000
Cores		2				2
Threads		2				2
Base frequency		3.0 GHz				3.0 GHz
Turbo frequency		-				-
Cache memory		2 MB				6 MB
Max memory capacity		4 GB				8 GB
Memory types		DDR3-SDRAM				DDR2-800
Max PCIe lanes		16				16
TDP		65 W				65 W
Suggested PSU		600W ATX Power Supply				600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics		None				None
Socket		LGA775				LGA775
Compatible motherboard		Socket LGA 775 Motherboard				Socket LGA 775 Motherboard
Maximum temperature		74.1°C				72.4°C
CPU-Z single thread		226				258
CPU-Z multi thread		308				525
Cinebench R15 single thread		90				101
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		176				175
Cinebench R23 single thread		577				450
Cinebench R23 multi-thread		1,052				854
PassMark single thread		1,164				1,233
PassMark CPU Mark		1,002				1,151
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core		1,606				1,831
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core		2,533				3,028
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		26.5 GFLOPS				28.9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		39 pts / W				47 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Pentium E5700 was designed earlier. Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 70%.CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.In single core, the difference is -11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.In single core, the difference is 28%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 15%.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.

On Linux 64-bit:

In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 18%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.Intel Pentium E5700 AMD equivalentIntel Core 2 Duo E8400 AMD equivalent

Disclaimer: When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.