What are three criteria used to determine whether the communication is competent?

What is competent communication behaviour of patients in physician consultations? - Chronically-ill patients answer in focus groups

Erika Schmidt et al. Psychol Health Med. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Many desirable outcomes depend on good patient-physician communication. Patient-based perspectives of what constitutes competent communication behavior with physicians are needed for patient-oriented health care. Therefore it was our main aim to identify competent patient communication skills from the patient's perspective. We also wanted to reveal any differences in opinion among various groups (chronic ischemic heart disease, chronic low back pain, breast cancer). This study examined nine guideline-supported focus groups in rehabilitation centers. The criterion for study inclusion was any one of the three diagnoses. Enrolled in the study were N = 49 patients (32 women) aged M = 60.1 (SD = 12.8). The interview recordings were transcribed and subjected to content analysis. We documented 396 commentaries in these interviews that were allocated to 82 different codes; these in turn resulted in the formation of 12 main topics. Examples are: posing questions, being an active and participatory patient, being aware of emotions and communicating them. This study represents stage two ('documentation of patient and clinician views') in the seven-stage model of communication research. Findings reveal that chronically-ill patients name behaviours that contribute to successful discussion with a physician. These enable us to develop communication trainings and design-measuring tools used for patient-based communication skills.

Keywords: Patient-physician communication; communication skills; communication training programs; patient communication competence; patient participation.

Similar articles

  • Patient communication competence: development of a German questionnaire and correlates of competent patient behavior.

    Farin E, Schmidt E, Gramm L. Farin E, et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Nov 28. Patient Educ Couns. 2014. PMID: 24332119

  • Development of a questionnaire to assess communication preferences of patients with chronic illness.

    Farin E, Gramm L, Kosiol D. Farin E, et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jan;82(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Mar 12. Patient Educ Couns. 2011. PMID: 20219317

  • Oncology clinicians' defenses and adherence to communication skills training with simulated patients: an exploratory study.

    Bernard M, de Roten Y, Despland JN, Stiefel F. Bernard M, et al. J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(3):399-403. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0366-8. J Cancer Educ. 2012. PMID: 22535318

  • [Acceptance and understandability of various methods of health valuations for the chronically ill: willingness to pay, visual analogue scale and rating scale].

    Meder M, Farin E. Meder M, et al. Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Nov;71(11):e62-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248142. Epub 2010 Jan 21. Gesundheitswesen. 2009. PMID: 20094981 German.

  • [Patient-provider communication in chronic illness: current state of research in selected areas].

    Farin E. Farin E. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2010 Oct;49(5):277-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1263160. Epub 2010 Oct 20. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2010. PMID: 20963669 Review. German.

Cited by

  • Patients' Health Literacy in Rehabilitation: Comparison between the Estimation of Patients and Health Care Professionals.

    Voigt-Barbarowicz M, Dietz G, Renken N, Schmöger R, Brütt AL. Voigt-Barbarowicz M, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph29063522. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35329219 Free PMC article.

  • A Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speakers' Experience with Dense Breast Notifications in a Massachusetts Safety-Net Hospital.

    Gunn CM, Fitzpatrick A, Waugh S, Carrera M, Kressin NR, Paasche-Orlow MK, Battaglia TA. Gunn CM, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):198-205. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4709-y. Epub 2018 Oct 22. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 30350031 Free PMC article.

  • Reconsidering the role of language in medicine.

    Franz B, Murphy JW. Franz B, et al. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2018 Jun 5;13(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13010-018-0058-z. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2018. PMID: 29871701 Free PMC article.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

  • Full Text Sources

    • Taylor & Francis
  • Other Literature Sources

    • scite Smart Citations
  • Medical

    • MedlinePlus Health Information

What are the 3 competence of communication?

The component model's three parts requires that a communicator be able to 1) recognize what communication practice is appropriate (knowledge), 2) have the ability to perform that practice (skill), and 3) want to communicate in an effective and appropriate manner (motivation).

What are the criteria in assessing communicative competence explain each?

Basically, there are three factors that influence communicative competence assessment: (a) the culture and context of observation (the culture of the observers is different and makes use of distinct criteria), (b) standards (they cannot be applied to all the individuals of the same community) and (c) conflicts of ...

What makes a competent communication?

Competent communicators are able to assess what is going to be appropriate and effective in a given context and then modify their behaviors accordingly. That ability is important because what works in one situation might be ineffective in another.

What are the four key points of competent communication?

Four Characteristics of Competent Communicators. In addition to having knowledge and the ability to adapt to various communication contexts, competent communicators also have the following four qualities in common: they are prepared, clear, concise, and ethical.