Currently the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) state that peripheral catheters do not need to be replaced more frequently than every 72–96 h to reduce the risk of infection and phlebitis in adults. Although results from some observational studies have shown that the risk of phlebitis rises with increasing catheter dwell time, 2 - Mestre Roca G
- Berbel Bertolo C
- Tortajada Lopez P
- et al.
Assessing the influence of risk factors on rates and dynamics of peripheral vein phlebitis: an
observational cohort study. - Crossref
- PubMed
- Scopus (48)
- Google Scholar
, , other studies have not confirmed this finding. ,
, , 8 - Webster J
- Osborne S
- Rickard C
- Hall J
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine
replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Catheter replacement trials are frequently limited by study design and small sample size. , 8 - Webster J
- Osborne S
- Rickard C
- Hall J
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Therefore, the study in The Lancet by Claire Rickard and colleagues, which compares intravenous catheter replacement in adults every 3
days with replacement when clinically indicated, is a major contribution to this debate. It is a large (3283 patients), multisite, randomised trial with high quality methods, excellent enrolment (97%) and follow-up (100%), and broad inclusion criteria. To read this article in full you will need to make a payment References- 1.
- O'Grady NP
- Alexander M
- Burns LA
- et al.
Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control. 2011; 39: S1-34 - 2.
- Mestre Roca G
- Berbel Bertolo C
- Tortajada Lopez P
- et
al.
Assessing the influence of risk factors on rates and dynamics of peripheral vein phlebitis: an observational cohort study. Medicina Clinica. 2012; 139: 185-191 - 3.
- Malach T
- Jerassy Z
- Rudensky B
- et al.
Prospective surveillance of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters. Am J Infect Control. 2006;
34: 308-312 - 4.
- Powell J
- Tarnow KG
- Perucca R
The relationship between peripheral intravenous catheter indwell time and the incidence of phlebitis. J Infus Nurs. 2008; 31: 39-45 - 5.
Controversial issues in the care and maintenance of vascular
access devices in the long-term/subacute care client. J Infus Nurs. 2001; 24: 249-254 - 6.
Evidence for elective replacement of peripheral intravenous catheter to prevent thrombophlebitis: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2006; 55: 715-722 - 7.
Guidelines on timing in replacing peripheral intravenous catheters. J Clin Nurs. 2012; 21: 1499-1506 - 8.
- Webster J
- Osborne S
- Rickard C
- Hall J
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;
3 () - 9.
- Rickard CM
- Webster J
- Wallis MC
- et al.
Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2012; 380: 1066-1074 - 10.
Tolentino ACM, Takemoto ML, Fernandes RA, Passos RB, Cukier FN. Value in health. Routine
replacement of peripheral intravenous catheter versus clinically indicated replacement: a cost comparison study from the public payer perspective. ISPOR 13th Annual European Congress; Prague, Czech Republic; Nov 6–9, 2010. A413–14. - 11.
- Lee WL
- Chen HL
- Tsai TY
- et al.
Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective study of 3165 patients. Am J
Infect Control. 2009; 37: 683-686 - 12.
- Soifer NE
- Borzak S
- Edlin BR
- Weinstein RA
Prevention of peripheral venous catheter complications with an intravenous therapy team: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158: 473-477 - 13.
- Nassaji-Zavareh
M
- Ghorbani R
Peripheral intravenous catheter-related phlebitis and related risk factors. Singapore Med J. 2007; 48: 733-736 - 14.
- Gillies D
- O'Riordan L
- Wallen M
- Morrison A
- Rankin K
- Nagy S
Optimal timing for intravenous administration set replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;
4 ()
Article InfoPublication HistoryPublished: 22 September 2012 IdentificationDOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61338-5 Copyright© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. ScienceDirectAccess this article on ScienceDirectLinked Articles- Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial
Peripheral intravenous catheters can be removed as clinically indicated; this policy will avoid millions of catheter insertions, associated discomfort, and substantial costs in both equipment and staff workload. Ongoing close monitoring should continue with timely treatment cessation and prompt removal for complications. - Full-Text
- PDF
|