Summary
Relative performance Show
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 M33046 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 5670 .This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.Supports Direct3D 12 Async ComputeSupports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)Supports MantleBased on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5670Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications No clear winner declaredWe have no data to declare a winner at this time. Core ConfigurationRadeon R5 M330Radeon HD 5670GPU NameExo (Exo PRO)vsRedwood (Redwood XT)Fab Process28 nmvs40 nmDie Size77 mm²vs104 mm²Transistors1,040 millionvs627 millionShaders320vs400Compute Units5vs5Core clock955 MHzvs775 MHzROPs8vs8TMUs20vs20 Memory ConfigurationRadeon R5 M330Radeon HD 5670Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5Bus Width64 bitvs128 bitMemory Speed900 MHz 1800 MHz effectivevs1000 MHz 4000 MHz effectiveMemory Size2048 Mbvs1024 Mb Additional detailsRadeon R5 M330Radeon HD 5670TDP18 wattsvs64 wattsRelease Date5 May 2015vs14 Jan 2010
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GB/s - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better) Chúng tôi so sánh hai GPU Nền tảng di động: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M435 và 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6470M để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores32080Compute units5no dataCore clock speed1030 MHz750 MHzBoost clock speed1030 MHzno dataNumber of transistors690 million292 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm40 nmPower consumption (TDP)18 Watt11 WattTexture fill rate20.606.000Floating-point performance659.2 gflops120 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on Radeon R5 M330 and Radeon HD 6370M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Bus supportPCIe 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeDDR3DDR3Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GBMemory bus width64 Bit64 BitMemory clock speed1000 MHz800 MHzMemory bandwidth14.4 GB/s12.8 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. AppAcceleration-no dataEnduro-no dataHD3D+no dataPowerTune+no dataDualGraphics1no dataTrueAudio-no dataZeroCore+no dataSwitchable graphics1no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectXDirectX® 1211.2 (11_0)Shader Model5.05.0OpenGL4.44.4OpenCLNot Listed1.2Vulkan+N/AMantle+no data Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. R5 M330 outperforms HD 6370M by 115% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% R5 M330 outperforms HD 6370M by 116% in Passmark. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 20774−5 3−4 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey0−1 0−1 Battlefield 51−2 0−1 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−11 +25% 8−9 −25% Cyberpunk 20774−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Forza Horizon 44−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Hitman 32−3 0−1 Horizon Zero Dawn1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 24−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey0−1 0−1 Battlefield 51−2 0−1 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−11 +25% 8−9 −25% Cyberpunk 20774−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Forza Horizon 44−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Hitman 32−3 0−1 Horizon Zero Dawn1−2 0−1 Metro Exodus2−3 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 24−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt4−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey0−1 0−1 Battlefield 51−2 0−1 Cyberpunk 20774−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Forza Horizon 44−5 +300% 1−2 −300% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt4−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare4−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Hitman 34−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Horizon Zero Dawn7−8 +0% 7−8 +0% Red Dead Redemption 20−1 0−1 Shadow of the Tomb Raider4−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% 1440p Ultra Preset Cyberpunk 20771−2 +0% 1−2 +0% Far Cry 52−3 0−1 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Hitman 32−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Horizon Zero Dawn6−7 +0% 6−7 +0% Red Dead Redemption 20−1 0−1 4K Ultra Preset Far Cry 53−4 2−3 Far Cry New Dawn5−6 +0% 5−6 +0% Forza Horizon 41−2 0−1 This is how R5 M330 and HD 6370M compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 1.53 0.71 Recency 7 May 2015 26 November 2010 Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB Pipelines / CUDA cores 320 80 Memory bandwidth 14.4 12.8 Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 11 Watt The Radeon R5 M330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6370M in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Radeon R5 M330 Radeon HD 6370M Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate AMD Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:  Rate AMD Radeon HD 6370M on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
