Is i5 11400H good for rendering?

Is i5 11400H good for rendering?

The Intel Core i5-11400H is a high-end hexa-core SoC for gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 generation and was announced in mid 2021. It integrates six Willow Cove processor cores (12 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and at 45 Watt is at 2.7 GHz. The single core boost speed can reach up to 4.5 GHz, all cores can reach up to 4.1 GHz. The CPU geatures 12 MB L3 cache and supports DDR4-3200 memory.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (20 lanes in the H45 series), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

Performance

The average 11400H in our database matches AMD Ryzen 5 5600U and Intel Core i7-10750H in multi-thread performance, rendering the Core i5 a decent mid-range option. It isn't as fast as the mighty Ryzen 9 5900HS, yet it will let you run nearly all games released in 2021 at High or Ultra settings if mated to a good graphics card.

The SoC features an improved Gen 12 graphics adapter called UHD Graphics with 16 EUs.

The chip is produced on the second-gen 10 nm Intel SuperFin process that should be comparable to the 7 nm TSMC process (used for e.g. Ryzen 4000 series). The default TDP is rated at 45 W at 2.7 GHz base speed, at 35 Watt the base clock speed decreases to 2.2 GHz (cTDP down).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core

min: 6674     avg: 8100     median: 8259 (14%)     max: 9406 Points

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core

min: 1349     avg: 1421     median: 1459 (64%)     max: 1472 Points

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

min: 522     avg: 556     median: 562 (65%)     max: 569 Points

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

min: 2550     avg: 3118     median: 3125 (13%)     max: 3740 Points

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

min: 1014     avg: 1284     median: 1249 (13%)     max: 1532 Points

0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit

min: 202     avg: 213.6     median: 218 (66%)     max: 219 Points

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs

min: 27615     avg: 33780     median: 32228 (20%)     max: 40268 MIPS

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs

min: 4802     avg: 5056     median: 5094 (61%)     max: 5158 MIPS

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset

min: 8.19     avg: 9.5     median: 9.1 (19%)     max: 11.3 fps

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES

Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *

min: 340     avg: 404.8     median: 419 (3%)     max: 483 Seconds

R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *

min: 0.582     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.644 sec

3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU

min: 12039     avg: 12041     median: 12041 (26%)     max: 12043 Points

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics

min: 8859     avg: 12255     median: 11978 (33%)     max: 15086 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics

min: 69034     avg: 70373     median: 70372.5 (59%)     max: 71711 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics

min: 9771     avg: 11020     median: 10911 (28%)     max: 12377 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics

min: 9406     avg: 16176     median: 16865.5 (31%)     max: 19795 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU

min: 4618     avg: 6281     median: 5832 (29%)     max: 7707 Points

Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core

min: 1396     avg: 1480     median: 1510.5 (65%)     max: 1528 points

Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core

min: 4679     avg: 6152     median: 6350.5 (22%)     max: 7018 points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *

min: 655     avg: 671     median: 661 (1%)     max: 702 ms

Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *

min: 135.9     avg: 156.2     median: 156.2 (2%)     max: 176.4 ms

Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score

min: 60869     avg: 63575     median: 63574.5 (66%)     max: 66280 Points

WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score

min: 243     avg: 251.2     median: 253 (67%)     max: 259 Points

Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *

min: 51.3     avg: 61.6     median: 57.9 (10%)     max: 75.7 Watt

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *

min: 66.4     avg: 78.2     median: 72.4 (15%)     max: 95.9 Watt

0102030405060708090100Tooltip

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

min: 15.8     avg: 17.3     median: 16.9 (19%)     max: 19.2 Points per Watt

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card

Is i5 11400H good for rendering?
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance


v1.19

log 24. 06:12:57

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 20 Nov 2022 18:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.019s ... 0.019s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13147 +0.01s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 13147 +0.033s ... 0.067s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.068s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.075s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.083s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.089s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.095s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.024s ... 0.119s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.064s ... 0.184s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.02s ... 0.204s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.204s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.209s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.209s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.024s ... 0.233s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.233s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.055s ... 0.288s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.288s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.293s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.293s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.01s ... 0.303s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.013s ... 0.316s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.021s ... 0.337s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.346s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.346s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.062s ... 0.408s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.408s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.408s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.021s ... 0.429s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.429s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.013s ... 0.442s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.442s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.442s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.45s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.45s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.45s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.458s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.458s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.026s ... 0.484s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.484s

#54 min, max, avg, median took s +0.054s ... 0.539s

#55 return log +0.019s ... 0.557s

Reviews for the Intel Core i5-11400H processor

Is i5 11400H good for rendering?

Dell Inspiron 15 Plus laptop review: Close to being the perfect all-rounder

With the Inspiron 15 Plus, Dell offers a sleek and compact multimedia laptop that is suitable for all kinds of purposes. We took a detailed look at the 15-inch ...
Intel Core i5-11400H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 1.9 kg

Is i5 11400H good for rendering?

Gigabyte G5 GD in review: Affordable gaming laptop without Windows

For just under 750 Euros (~$848), you can get the G5 GD, a gaming laptop equipped with a Tiger Lake hexa-core processor and a GeForce RTX 3050 laptop GPU. The l...
Intel Core i5-11400H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2.1 kg

Is i5 11400H good for rendering?

Dell XPS 15 9510 Core i5 laptop review: Basic model with the brakes engaged

The Dell XPS 15 continues to be one of the few high-end multimedia laptops that is optionally also offered without a dedicated graphics card. So while those who...
Intel Core i5-11400H | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | 15.60" | 1.8 kg

Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-53-54XN: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-53-54XN

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-505V: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-505V

Gigabyte G7 GD: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte G7 GD

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-54 NH.QC5EP.00A: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-54 NH.QC5EP.00A

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-54-582Q: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-54-582Q

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE-HN012: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE-HN012

MSI GF63 Thin 11UC-447XES: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 11UC-447XES

MSI Katana GF66 11UD-1222PL: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UD-1222PL

HP Envy 15-ep1008ns: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep1008ns

MSI Katana GF66 11UD-480XUA: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UD-480XUA

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB-HN256T: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB-HN256T

Gigabyte G5 KD-52DE123SD: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte G5 KD-52DE123SD

Dell Vostro 15 7510, i5-11400H RTX 3050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 15 7510, i5-11400H RTX 3050

HP Victus 16-d0206nf: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0206nf

HP Victus 16-d0655ng: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0655ng

Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD: Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM-HN016: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM-HN016

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB-HN243T: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB-HN243T

Lenovo Legion 5 17ITH6H-82JM000FGE: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 17ITH6H-82JM000FGE

Gigabyte G5 GD: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte G5 GD

HP Victus 16-d0367ng: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0367ng

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM-HN184: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM-HN184

Gigabyte G5 MD-51US123SH: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte G5 MD-51US123SH

MSI Katana GF66 11UD-836XFR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UD-836XFR

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-56HH: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-56HH

HP Victus 16-d0146ng: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0146ng

MSI Sword 15 A11UE: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Sword 15 A11UE

HP Victus 16-d0057ng: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0057ng

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-545N: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-545N

MSI Katana GF66 11UC-093: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UC-093

Gigabyte G5 GD: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
   » 1st place for the GeForce RTX 3050 laptop GPU in the Gigabyte G5 GD

Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD: Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » The basic model of the Dell XPS 15 with the Core i5 is simply too expensive

Is Intel Core i5 11400 good for rendering?

Rendering Benchmarks on Intel Core i5-11400 As expected given the trends we identified from the measurements above, the Core i5-11400 takes the lead in all single-threaded rendering work, including Cinbench R20 and POV-Ray.

Is i5 12600K good for rendering?

Moving on to the rendering benchmarks, in Cinebench R23, Intel Core i5-12600K managed an all-cores score of 16843 points. It's an excellent result too (the i7-12700K is 31.3% faster). In Blender, we chose to render the bmw27 and classroom scenes. Here, the shorter the rendering time, the better.

Is i5 12400f good for rendering?

It has been used for CG in countless motion pictures and television series. V-Ray supports all major 3D applications, which makes it a great fit for any rendering pipeline.

Is i5 good for video rendering?

if you just do normal home video editing, for example, editing 1080p or 2K home videos, Intel Core i5 is a good choice. But if you want to do professional 4K video editing or higher, Intel Core i5 is not enough, you need i7 or i9. Is Intel Core i5 good for video editing? Yes the core-i5 is a very capable processor.