Địa chỉ : 50 Nguyễn Xuân Khoát, P. Tân Thành, Q. Tân Phú, TPHCM Show Điện thoại : 028 3812 3816 - Hotline : 0909 212 772 Email : [email protected] Website : www.econnect.com.vn Giấy chứng nhận ĐKKD số: 4102051249 do sở Kế Hoạch và Đầu Tư cấp ngày 19/06/2006 Mức tiêu thụ điện năng của Quadro K1100M được đánh giá ở mức TGP là 45 W bao gồm cả bo mạch và thành phần bộ nhớ. Do đó, thẻ phù hợp với các máy tính xách tay cỡ trung bình có màn hình 15.6 inch trở lên. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores576384Core clock speed667 MHz705 MHzNumber of transistors2,540 million1,270 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)55 Watt45 WattTexture fill rate32.0222.59Floating-point performance768.4 gflops542.2 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on Quadro K2100M and Quadro K1100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sizedInterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-A (3.0) MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed3000 MHz2800 MHzMemory bandwidth48.0 GB/s44.8 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputsDisplay Port1.21.2 TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Optimus++3D Vision Pro++Mosaic++nView Display Management++Optimus++ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX1212Shader Model55OpenGL4.54.5OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan++CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. K2100M outperforms K1100M by 25% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 25% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 18% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 31% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 20% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 28% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 53% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 49% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 37% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 33% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Octane Render OctaneBenchThis is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists. Benchmark coverage: 4% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 22% in Octane Render OctaneBench. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04Benchmark coverage: 3% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 28% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03Benchmark coverage: 3% K1100M outperforms K2100M by 6% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02Benchmark coverage: 3% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 38% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04Benchmark coverage: 3% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 26% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01Benchmark coverage: 3% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 26% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01Benchmark coverage: 3% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 4% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01Benchmark coverage: 3% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 16% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01Benchmark coverage: 3% K1100M outperforms K2100M by 33% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01. SPECviewperf 12 - ShowcaseBenchmark coverage: 2% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 16% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase. SPECviewperf 12 - MayaThis part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes. Benchmark coverage: 2% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 28% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya. SPECviewperf 12 - CatiaBenchmark coverage: 2% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 26% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia. SPECviewperf 12 - SolidworksBenchmark coverage: 2% K1100M outperforms K2100M by 6% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks. SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NXBenchmark coverage: 2% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 38% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX. SPECviewperf 12 - CreoBenchmark coverage: 2% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 26% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo. SPECviewperf 12 - MedicalBenchmark coverage: 2% K2100M outperforms K1100M by 4% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical. SPECviewperf 12 - EnergyBenchmark coverage: 2% K1100M outperforms K2100M by 33% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD24 18 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 20776−7 +0% 6−7 +0% Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5−6 +25% 4−5 −25% Battlefield 59−10 +50% 6−7 −50% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +8.3% 12−14 −8.3% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +0% 6−7 +0% Far Cry 56−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Forza Horizon 410−12 +22.2% 9−10 −22.2% Hitman 37−8 +40% 5−6 −40% Horizon Zero Dawn6−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Red Dead Redemption 27−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% Shadow of the Tomb Raider10−11 +11.1% 9−10 −11.1% Watch Dogs: Legion2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5−6 +25% 4−5 −25% Battlefield 59−10 +50% 6−7 −50% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +8.3% 12−14 −8.3% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +0% 6−7 +0% Far Cry 56−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Forza Horizon 410−12 +22.2% 9−10 −22.2% Hitman 37−8 +40% 5−6 −40% Horizon Zero Dawn6−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Metro Exodus5−6 +25% 4−5 −25% Red Dead Redemption 27−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% Shadow of the Tomb Raider10−11 +11.1% 9−10 −11.1% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt9 +28.6% 7 −28.6% Watch Dogs: Legion2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5−6 +25% 4−5 −25% Battlefield 59−10 +50% 6−7 −50% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +0% 6−7 +0% Far Cry 56−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Forza Horizon 410−12 +22.2% 9−10 −22.2% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt8−9 +100% 4 −100% Watch Dogs: Legion2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare6−7 +20% 5−6 −20% Hitman 37−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% Horizon Zero Dawn9−10 +0% 9−10 +0% Metro Exodus1−2 +0% 1−2 +0% Red Dead Redemption 22−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider6−7 +20% 5−6 −20% 1440p Ultra Preset Cyberpunk 20772−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Far Cry 55−6 +25% 4−5 −25% Far Cry New Dawn1−2 0−1 Forza Horizon 44−5 +100% 2−3 −100% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt1−2 0−1 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare3−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Hitman 33−4 +0% 3−4 +0% Horizon Zero Dawn7−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% Red Dead Redemption 22−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider0−1 0−1 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey0−1 0−1 Cyberpunk 20770−1 0−1 Far Cry 54−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +0% 6−7 +0% Forza Horizon 44−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% This is how K2100M and K1100M compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 3.51 2.81 Cost $84.95 $109.94 Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt The Quadro K2100M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1100M in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. User ratingsDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. |